Author: Shelby Watford

Final Research Project: Every Empire Needs an Emperor

Shelby Watford

ARH 351

Final Research Paper

21 April 2015

Every Empire Needs an Emperor

Throughout the class we have learned about many different cultures and early civilizations. In essentially every one there was a period when a strong ruler came into power and created an empire, or at least stabilized the culture for an extended period under their rule. Specifically I will analyze the similarities and differences between the Greek empire that rose and fell under the rule of Alexander the Great, and the Roman Empire that emerged under the rule of Augustus Caesar. The Romans most definitely learned and adopted many traditions, styles and culture from the Greeks, but always changing them to give it a Roman twist. The building of an empire is no different. Augustus had to have been thinking of Alexander and how his empire fell after his death, so his Roman twist was building an empire that would last past his death. A few of the works that will be examined are: the Portrait of Alexander the Great, Portrait Bust of Cato the Elder and the Augustus Primaporta.

 

One major thing that Alexander and Augustus had in common was their influential fathers and the foundation each of them laid for their sons to take charge. Augustus’s father Julius was actually his great uncle who adopted him when his name was Octavius, it became Octavian after adoption and in 26 BCE the senate granted him the name Augustus meaning “the exalted.” Alexander, however, was raised by his birth father King Philip II to be a great leader. Aristotle tutored Alexander from an extremely early age, and at eighteen he took over as leader of the Companion Cavalry to assist his father in defeating the Athenians and the Thebans at the battle of Chaeronea. Leading up to this point King Philip had came to power in 360 BCE and in less than a decade defeated most of Macedonia’s neighboring enemies. Philip put lots of interest on innovations in military technology such as catapults and siege machines, innovations such as these laid the ground work for what Alexander would go on to do. The battle of Chaeronea was the last phase of Philip’s plan to become the sole ruler of Greece, and with the help of Alexander he accomplished it. Shortly thereafter in 336 BCE Philip was assassinated. It was now time for Alexander to take charge, and he had his father to thank for the prime foundation to expand and conquer. (Hemingway)

 

Augustus was not brought up the same way as Alexander. His great uncle Julius Caesar, the last ruler of the Roman Republic, adopted Augustus. Julius had laid the groundwork in similar fashion the way Philip did for Alexander, and was also assassinated before his own rule could actually begin. It wasn’t until the death of Julius that Augustus learned he was being adopted and named chief personal heir, Augustus was eighteen at the time. Augustus was involved in celebrating public games, which had been instituted by Julius, to incorporate himself into the city populous. He succeeded in winning over a substantial number of Julius’s troops to join his alliance. Essentially the main thing Julius did for Augustus was adopt him; from there Augustus made the calls. (Encyclopedia Britannica)

Soon after Augustus had won over the troops the Senate called on him for help against Antony, who was then forced to head Gaul. Augustus then made an agreement with Antony and Marcus Ledipus in which each of them got a five-year doctoral appointment to see over the reconstruction of the state. They came up with a list of political enemies and proceeded to take them out. They executed 300 senators and 2,000 knights who ranked just below the senators. Augustus continued his progression towards becoming emperor by becoming such a successful military leader, though he had some low points along the way such as his first operations against Sextus Sicilian. (Encyclopedia Britannica)

Augustus finally assumed full control of Rome after he defeated Antony’s ships at the battle of Actium in 31 BCE. As a result of the battle Antony fled with his lover Queen Cleopatra of Egypt who had come to his aid but failed miserably. The couple escaped to Egypt where they then committed suicide. With his opponents now dead, Augustus was the undisputed ruler of Rome. (Fagan)

 

Now that the foundation has been laid, it’s time to examine the reign of each ruler once they took power. As mentioned earlier Alexander had already become a commander at eighteen; by the age twenty he was king, and by twenty-six he had conquered the Persian Empire. Alexander died at the age of thirty-two, so the fact that he was able to expand the empire so vastly in such a short amount of time speaks volumes to his brilliance as a military leader. However, Alexander was lacking in some other areas like politics and regulation as his main interest, really his only interest was conquest. Alexander’s ambition was unmatched, but his popularity was not so great during his rule. Alexander was actually quite hated among many of the Greeks, one Athenian orator had this to see when he learned of Alexander’s death, “What? Alexander dead? Impossible! The world would reek of his corpse!” Essentially Alexander was simply interested in expanding the empire just because he could, and he has his father to thank for that because without the foundation he laid for Alexander, none of it would have been possible. (Foner)

 

Augustus was much more politically driven than Alexander. After he defeated Antony in 31 BCE he spent the next four years securing his rule on almost every front, he seized Cleopatra’s treasure, which allowed him to pay his soldiers handsomely to insure their loyalty. To ease the minds of the senate and other powerful classes Augustus passed laws that seemed to stretch back to the Roman Republic. He also put a significant amount of effort into the improvement and beautification of the city of Rome in order to win over the general public. Augustus reigned for forty years, basically doubled the size of the empire by adding new territories in both Europe and Asia and locking down alliances to secure his territory from Britain to India. Much of his time was spent on the move as he was strengthening his power in the provinces by establishing a census and tax system that would span the whole empire. This system led to the expansion of road networks throughout the empire, the foundation of the Praetorian Guard and the Roman Postal Service. He also built a new forum and added more practical services such as a police force and fire departments. Augustus knew he had to have the military might to first become emperor, but it was his political genius that made him such an effective ruler. (History.com Staff)

 

When looking at the Portrait of Alexander the Great by Lysippos the first thing that one should notice is Alexander is depicted clean-shaven. This was a huge statement because all portraits done before depicting Greek statesmen or rulers had beards. This marked a shift in royal fashion in art that stood for nearly five hundred years. That being true it highly impacted depictions of Augustus because it spanned well into the Roman Empire. The portrait discussed is one of just a few, mainly due to Alexander only choosing a small number of artist to depict his image, the biggest name being Lysippos. No paintings of Alexander survive, only sculptures and coins. The early depictions of Alexander make him appear more god-like due to his young appearance, long hair, but it does resemble his description in literary sources. Also, Alexander was young throughout his rule dying at thirty-two as mentioned earlier, so the depictions of a young Alexander would make sense because much of conquering was done early on when he was in his twenties. Later on, after his death, depictions began to show him as older and more mature; the sculptures of his younger self were done while he was alive. (British Museum Staff)

 

Another work that was influenced by the style change under Alexander is the Portrait Bust of Cato the Elder from the Roman Republic; the influence spans into the Roman Empire extensively, but the work analyzed in class is the Augustus Primaporta. The sculpture of Augustus reflects the more individualized and detailed depiction of the face shown in the bust of Cato. The Augustus Primaporta was most likely commissioned by Augustus’s adopted son Tiberius. It is definitely more individualized than the Portrait of Alexander the Great, but the influence is still extremely obvious. One difference besides the facial features being more detailed is Augustus is shown with shorter hair when compared to depictions of Alexander. (Museos Vaticanos)

 

Everything considered Alexander the Great’s success can credited in part to his father for laying the foundation needed with numerous innovations and advances in military, then the young ambitious ruler set out to conquer with all his resources and never looked back. Similarly Augustus owes partial credit to Julius Caesar for doing him the tremendous favor of adopting him and naming him heir; Augustus took advantage of the opportunity, but was genius in the way he maneuvered to gain complete control of Roman and began a lasting empire. The influence of art from Alexander the Great can be seen in the art of both the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire. Overall the Roman Empire under Augustus has many similarities with Greece under Alexander the Great ranging from origins of the respective empires to the art depicting the rulers.

 

Works Cited

Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. “Augustus”, accessed April 20, 2015, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/43047/Augustus.

Hemingway, Colette and Seán Hemingway. “The Rise of Macedonia and the

Conquests of Alexander the Great”. In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History.

New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/alex/hd_alex.htm (October 2004)

Fagan, Garrett G. “Augustus (31 B.C. – 14 A.D.)”

http://www.roman-emperors.org/auggie.htm

Foner, Eric and Garraty, John A. “Alexander the Great.” Houghton Mifflin

Harcourt Publishing Company, 1991.

http://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/alexander-the-great

History.com Staff, “Augustus” 2009. A&E Networks, 2009.

http://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/emperor-augustus

British Museum Staff, “Portrait of Alexander the Great.”

http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/highlight_objects/gr/m/portrait_alexander_the_great.aspx

Museos Vaticanos, “Augustus of Prima Porta.”

http://mv.vatican.va/4_ES/pages/zPatrons/MV_Patrons_04_03.html#page-top

Thoth: Egyptian God of Knowledge

Thoth was a popular god in the Ancient Egyptian pantheon. He was commonly known as the god of learning, writing, the languages, essentially the god of knowledge. Thoth was also the god of the moon. He was considered to be the inventor writing and the creator of the languages; Thoth was also known as the scribe and the interpreter because he was an adviser to the other gods. In some instances he was a representative of the sun god, Re. The sacred animals that were used symbolically of Thoth include the ibis, which is a small bird with a curved beak, and the baboon. The most common depiction of Thoth is a man with the head of an ibis, sometimes holding a scribal palette and reed pen. The depictions where Thoth is holding the scribal palette and reed pen are symbolic of his being and adviser to the other gods; some of his other similar titles included mediator and peacemaker. Other depictions such as the baboon or just the ibis bird are also symbolic of Thoth. Millions of mummified remains of ibis and baboons were found near the city of Hermopolis, which was the center of the cult that worshiped Thoth. (Encyclopedia Britannica) It is located in Upper Egypt, south of Cairo, on the Nile River. Hermopolis was known as Khmunu in Ancient Egypt. In every depiction one thing is common, Thoth wears a lunar crescent on his head because he is the god of the moon. (Dixon, pantheon.org) However, the crescent moon was also believed to be similar to the curved beak of the ibis, so it also has connections there. Another connection with the moon is the baboon. Baboons are nocturnal animals, so the crescent moon again seems relevant. In the myth of Osiris, Thoth protects Isis during her pregnancy; he then goes on to heal her son’s (Horus) eye that had been wounded by Seth, the adversary of Osiris. In the legend Thoth uses intellect and magic to aid Horus in defeating Seth. Thoth also was in charge of weighing the hearts of the deceased at their judgment. After he weighed their hearts Thoth would report back to Osiris with his decision and what kind of afterlife the person deserved. The Greeks identified Thoth as Hermes, who was the messenger god. They said he was “Thoth, the thrice great.” The image chosen is of a small five and a half inch statue of Thoth. He is in the common form as a man with an ibis head, however he does not have a scribe and reed, and he depicted is walking hence the name, Striding Thoth.

By: Shelby Watford

Works Cited

“Thoth.” Encyclopedia Britannica. 2014.http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/593453/Thoth

Dixon, Marianne. “Thoth.” Encyclopedia Mythica.  http://www.pantheon.org/articles/t/thoth.html

Repatriation and the Ownership of Antiquity

Some countries believe that artifacts and major discoveries that originated in their own country belong to them regardless of who discovered it. These countries claim that the artifacts belong to them even though the artifacts are from ancient times and were not produced by the cultures within the countries today. Many of these countries want these artifacts to return to their original region as opposed to sitting in a museum in London or Paris. These museums, such as The British Museum and The Louvre, have a different opinion. Museums like these are called encyclopedic museums, and they hold many artifacts that came from all over the world, including Egypt. By having so many artifacts from so many different cultures in one place it makes it interesting to see how the cultures were similar, different, and how trading influenced the ancient world.

As mentioned earlier, the countries want the artifacts back because they believe they own them because it was produced in their region and is a part of their national history. These countries are essentially ignoring the fact that cultures are in a constant state of change, mainly due to trading and cultural exchange. Also, they are contradicting the idea behind encyclopedic museums by demanding they send back all of the artifacts. Encyclopedic museums are meant to show artifacts and objects from many cultures around the world in one place to ignite curiosity about the world, the way cultures connected, and the people who were involved. I believe that the museums should remain the protectors of the disputed artifacts because they have the means to maintain these artifacts, and above all keep them safe.

The issue of ownership in regards to antiquity is clear to me, it belongs to the people of the world, not just a specific country. These encyclopedic museums, such as The British Museum and The Louvre, are perfect examples of this idea. Anyone can go into The British Museum and see some of the most amazing artifacts from antiquity for free. To me that is simply amazing, when I was there last July I was at a loss for words due to the overwhelming amount of artifacts from all over the world that were suddenly before my eyes. “By presenting the artifacts of one time and one culture next to those of other times and culture, encyclopedic museums encourage curiosity about the world and its many peoples.” (Cuno, 120). The previous statement hit the nail on the head because that’s essentially the sensation I had while inside The British Museum, and again when I was in The Louvre only 2 days later.

Some countries would have their artifacts sent back for the sake of nationalism and sectarianism, which have nothing to do with antiquities but they would use them to persuade such ideals. These countries are basically claiming that the culture only existed there, and there it should stay. “Instead, they should express the guiding principles of the world’s great museums: pluralism, diversity, and the idea that culture shouldn’t stop at borders – and nor, for that matter, should the cosmopolitan ideals represented by encyclopedic museums.” (Cuno, 120).

The exchanging of artifacts between museums is one idea I can get behind. Instead of trying to take back artifacts countries should be working with museums to get artifacts not only from their past cultures but from all over the world. If more and more museums did this then more and more people could be exposed to multiple cultures from different regions of the world. Not everyone has the means to travel to museums like The Louvre, so if artifact exchanging became a common practice then it could spur a new interest in cultures people might not have even knew existed. Again this goes back to the idea of a cosmopolitan world, and that culture doesn’t have borders.

Dispute over ownership of antiquity artifacts is not something that is going to go away over night. Countries will keep pushing to have certain artifacts returned, but the museums will do their duty and stand their ground. The artifacts from antiquity cannot be replaced, so maintaining their condition and keeping them safe is a major concern which the museums handle magnificently in addition to allowing the world to experience a jump back in time when you walk through the doors.

By: Shelby Watford